by Rachel Botsman and Roo Rogers
Reputation
is one of the most salient areas where the push and pull between the
collective good and self-interest have real impact. Reputation is a
personal reward that is intimately bound up with respecting and
considering the needs of others. Undeniably, almost all of us wonder and
care, at least a little bit, what other people—friends, family,
coworkers, and people we have just met—think about us. But this question
of social reputation did not often affect our consumer behaviors. There
was no central place where all these soft perceptions, opinions, and
ratings accumulated; but also, as consumers operating in a
hyper-individualistic world, we considered our credit rating far more
important than any kind of peer-to-peer review. Now with the Web we
leave a reputation trail. With every seller we rate; spammer we flag;
comment we leave; idea, comment, video, or photo we post; peer we
review, we leave a cumulative record of how well we collaborate and if
we can be trusted.
Sometimes
people are not conscious of their reputation capital or have to
experience a loss to realize how important it is. Others are at first
cavalier and don’t see the connections or ramifications of their
actions. As Casey Fenton, founder of CouchSurfing, described it to us,
in everyday life you might have a disagreement with somebody and go your
separate ways. That person may speak badly about you to someone else,
but is unlikely to damage your reputation in the long term. “But in
CouchSurfing somebody cannot just tell one person, but tell everybody
about it. So the consequences are vastly different. It means you really
have to go the extra mile in the way you interact with people.”
Reputation
has always functioned as a form of reward for humans. The striatum at
the center of the brain is our monetary reward processor. Give a guy a
buck and the striatum lights up. In April 2008, Professor Norihiro
Sadato of Japan’s National Institute for Physiological Sciences added
one other critical function to the striatum: a reputation award
processor. Professor Sadato explains, “Although we intuitively know that
a good reputation makes us feel good, the idea that a good reputation
is a ‘reward’ had long been just an assumption without scientific
proof.” Sadato developed this theory by conducting a series of MRI scans
of the brains of nineteen subjects while they engaged in two different
exercises. The first was a basic game. Participants had to choose one of
three cards in the hope of winning a cash prize. The second exercise
asked participants to have their characters appraised based on the
results of personality trait questionnaires. The researchers found that
the striatum activated as expected when the participants won money. But
they also found that it responded to high and low appraisals (but did
not perk up to more neutral comments).9 Online rating systems, as well
as other examples of immediate and simple forms of community feedback,
provide these forms of appraisal that motivate people to behave in a
responsible way.
Today
reputation serves not only as a psychological reward or currency, but
also as an actual currency—called reputation capital. We have already
seen how people build their reputations by playing within the rules,
helping others, and touting their accomplishments. Reputation capital
has become so important that it acts as a secondary currency—a currency
that claims, “You can trust me.” As Andy Hobsbawm writes in Small Is the
Next Big Thing, “Online reputation systems are a new mechanism for
trust between individuals anywhere in the world and could become a
cornerstone of the modern economy.”
The
more you participate in Collaborative Consumption, the more reputation
capital you earn, and the more you earn, the more you can participate.
This dynamic manifests itself in tangible ways; for example, the more
hours you bank with a local time bank or LETS scheme by doing things for
other people, the more hours you have to spend on things you need. It
also operates in softer ways; for example, the better the review and
feedback you receive, the more choices are made available to you,
whether it’s places you can stay, what and whom you can barter with, or
who will lend money, tools, or a car, and so on. Reputation capital
becomes a currency to build trust between strangers and helps manage our
belief in the commons.
It
is only a matter of time before there is some form of network that
aggregates your reputation capital across multiple forms of
Collaborative Consumption. We’ll be able to perform a Google-like search
to see a complete picture of how people behave and the degree to which
they can be trusted, whether it’s around products they swap and trade or
money they lend or borrow or land or cars they share.
But
isn’t it in each company’s best interest to design a system that is
based on the actions performed within a single community? If you have
invested time building your reputation on thredUP, why would you want to
start from scratch on a new clothing exchange? Reputation systems that
are confined to a specific context therefore help companies sustain
loyalty and lower attrition because your reluctance to jump to a new
entrant or competitor means you are locked into that community.
But
we believe it will be possible to design a platform that aggregates
your reputation trail and contributions across various types of
communities. Joe Smith, for example, might show he is an eBay power
seller, has a thredUp “stylie” rating of 8.6 out of 10, has uploaded
fifteen hundred photos under a creative commons license on Flickr, is a
five-star member on RelayRides, has a 100 percent loan repay rate on
Zopa, and so on. In the same way that we can move our credit history
from one credit card to the next, our repository of trust and reputation
will carry from one community to another.
Your
reputation bank account, so to speak, will determine your access to
forms of Collaborative Consumption and could become a more influential
and valuable asset than your credit history. “By the end of this decade,
power and influence will shift largely to those people with the best
reputations and trust networks, from people with money and nominal
power,” Craig Newmark, founder of craigslist, recently commented.
No comments:
Post a Comment