TRENDS eMAGAZINE
The vision of a world in which
vehicles drive themselves, smoothly transporting their passengers at a steady
speed while maintaining a safe distance from all the other vehicles on the
road, has motivated companies like Google, GM, Toyota, Nissan, Audi, Ford,
Volvo, Daimler, and BMW to pour millions into efforts to develop driverless
cars.
To navigate roads autonomously
and safely, the vehicles typically include GPS, cameras, lasers, and radar to
identify the car’s position on the road, the location of obstacles and
pedestrians, and its distance from other vehicles, as well as processors to
combine all the data and enable the car to react in real time.
According to reports from
various manufacturers, some form of advanced automation will be available
within a decade. In the beginning, that may be limited to automated
systems that take control only on highways, and to cars that park themselves in
garages. But at some point beyond that, the vision of completely
autonomous traffic will become a reality.1
There are several major
benefits of automated vehicles. The list includes:
·
Fewer accidents: According to the World Health
Organization, more than 1.2 million people throughout the world are killed in
car crashes every year. Another 50 million people are injured in
accidents. According to The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
more than 90 percent of road crashes involve human error. Once humans are
no longer responsible for driving the car, accidents are expected to drop by an
equal percentage.2
·
Lower costs: According to the American Automobile Association,
accidents cause $300 billion in losses and 33,000 deaths on the road in the
United States each year. However, if the predictions about fewer
accidents hold true, then the costs will also lower.3
·
Time savings: Self-driving cars that can keep track of
each other using sensors could maintain the speed limit with a minimum of
distance between them.4
·
Greater convenience: A car could be left at the entrance to a
parking garage, where it would park itself. Or to avoid the expense of
parking at a convention center or airport, it could simply drive itself back to
the owner’s driveway.5
·
Efficiency: Since the typical car is idle for 96
percent of the time, allowing cars to drive themselves would maximize their
usage. For example, a car could return home after dropping the owner at
work, eliminating the need for a second car to take the children to school.6
·
Faster drive times: According to an engineering
study, automation could enable four times as many cars to travel on a given
amount of highway space, which would reduce the amount of time and fuel that is
being consumed on traffic congestion. The Texas Transportation Institute
estimates that 5.5 billion hours and 2.9 billion gallons of fuel are used
during traffic congestion. Vehicles would be automatically rerouted to
less-traveled roads, and traffic congestion could be eliminated.7
·
Higher productivity: When autonomous cars become the norm,
people will become even more productive. Initially, a licensed driver
will still need to sit behind the wheel in case the system fails. But by
within a decade, millions of drivers who once needed to remain focused on the road
will be free to devote their full attention to their work as they commute to
their offices or homes.8
However, the vision of a road
filled exclusively with entirely autonomous vehicles won’t be achieved anytime
soon. Before then, there will be a very rough transition period, in which
licensed drivers will still need to sit behind steering wheels, ready to
intervene should something go wrong. At the same time, during this
transition period there will be a mix of such semi-autonomous cars and
traditional human-controlled cars sharing the same highway.
This means that a human driver
of a conventional car that swerves abruptly between lanes or stops unexpectedly
will demand that autonomous cars in the vicinity react much more quickly than
they’ll need to respond when all traffic is perfectly coordinated.
Autonomous cars will still need human drivers to pay attention and take control
of the car if necessary. But there is a real risk that the driver of an
autonomous car will depend on the car to drive itself and will fail to pay
attention to the road. If that happens, the driver won’t be able to react
quickly enough to take control in an emergency.
According to Clifford Nass,
co-director of Stanford University’s Center for Automotive Research, “The first
generations [of autonomous cars] are going to require a driver to intervene at
certain points. It turns out that may be the most dangerous moment for
autonomous vehicles. We may have this terrible irony that when the car is
driving autonomously it is much safer, but because of the inability of humans
to get back in the loop it may ultimately be less safe.”9
Another potential hazard is
that, over time, drivers’ skills will atrophy. An analogy can be made to
pilots; because they rely heavily on autopilot, pilots are losing some of the
skills that they would have gained through experience. In 2011, in fact,
the Federal Aviation Administration suggested in a draft report that recent
crashes might have been caused by pilots over-relying on automation.10
Bryan Reimer, a research
scientist at MIT, has compiled a chart that shows how a driver’s performance is
affected by the number of tasks he is performing. When the driver is
distracted by too many tasks, performance declines sharply, as
one would expect. However, when the driver has too few things
to do, his performance also declines. Reimer concludes that a driver who
is daydreaming won’t be able to react quickly enough to take control to prevent
an accident.11
To address this issue,
companies will need to come up with ways to prevent drivers from losing
focus. Carmakers are likely to install software that will monitor drivers
and alert them if their attention wanders.
Another obstacle to the adoption
of autonomous cars is cost. According to Strategy+Business,
the spinning LIDAR that is mounted on the roofs of most driverless cars
currently costs about $70,000.12 That will price the car beyond the means
of most Americans. However, economies of scale will quickly reduce the
price. In quantities of 1 million units per year, the price should drop
to $500 per car or less within less than a decade of mass production.
Finally, objections have been
raised about the appearance of automated cars, which are typically unattractive
because of all of the necessary on-board equipment. But elderly drivers
who want to retain their mobility will not demand sleek styling. And
carmakers will devote more attention to aesthetics once they’ve figured out how
to make the cars both functional and affordable. Moreover, for higher-end
vehicles, where price is less of an issue, styling is already a priority.
For example, BMW has replaced the LIDAR on the roof with two laser scanners and
three radar sensors hidden in its front and rear bumpers.
Based on this trend, we offer
the following forecasts:
First, the number of cars on
the road will actually decline when all vehicles are autonomous.
This is because the car can
drive a family member to one place, drop him or her off, and then go back and
pick someone else up and bring that person to the place he or she wants to
go. In the long run, it will save families money because they will only
need to purchase and maintain one car. Furthermore, children under the
age of sixteen will be able to ride in the car without an adult, which will
increase their parents’ productivity. As accidents become extremely rare,
fewer vehicles will need to be replaced due to collision damage.
Second, people will use their
time more productively.
Instead of focusing solely on
driving, people will be able to their use commuting time to work. The
interiors of cars could be converted into workspaces, with swiveling chairs,
tables, and desks.
Third, trucking will undergo a
dramatic change.
Autonomous long-haul trucks
(ALHTs) will operate 24 hours per day, unlike human drivers whose hours are
legally limited. That means companies will not only eliminate the costs
of unionized truck drivers; they could also cut their truck fleets by
two-thirds. Also, each truck will be more fuel efficient. The
Center for Automotive Research predicts that driverless trucks would use 15 to
20 percent less fuel. For all these reasons, ALHTs will quickly return
the initial investment, and ultimately transportation costs will drop
dramatically, resulting in lower prices for consumers.
Fourth, many jobs will be lost
due to creative destruction.
People who deliver goods for a
living will no longer be able to keep their jobs once automation takes
over. Truck drivers and taxi drivers have the most to lose, because there
will no longer be a need for these jobs.
Fifth, as the vehicle industry
is disrupted by autonomous cars and trucks, new competitors will
dominate.
Suppliers of parts like
steering wheels will be as obsolete as the buggy whip manufacturers that were
disrupted when cars replaced horse-drawn carriages. Body shops that
specialize in repairing cars damaged in accidents will see their business
disappear. The balance of power among car manufacturers will also shift
as the basis of competition changes. Just as the Big Three ruled the
market when drivers coveted powerful engines, only to be usurped by the
Japanese car companies when fuel economy became more important, a new set of
companies may emerge at the top of the hierarchy when autonomy is a vehicle’s
most important feature.
Sixth, Google may be the
ultimate winner in the new automotive ecosystem.
While Google has gotten a lot
of attention for the autonomous car that has prowled 300,000 miles, It’s
interesting to note that Google hasn’t designed a new car; it has simplified
modified an existing Prius model with its own hardware and software.
While it’s too early to know precisely what Google is planning, it seems
unlikely that the company will enter the car business. Instead, its focus
could be on developing a system that would become the standard for all car
manufacturers. In effect, it would own the operating system that controlled
all of the vehicles, regardless of which company made each car, and it would
capture valuable information about the owners’ activities that could provide
Google with yet another profitable revenue stream.
Resource List:
1.
MIT Technology Review, November/December 2013, “Driverless Cars
Are Further Away Than You Think,” by Will Knight. © 2013 by Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520431/driverless-cars-are-further-away-than-you-think/
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520431/driverless-cars-are-further-away-than-you-think/
2.
Ibid.
3.
Ibid.
4.
MIT Technology Review, May/June 2013, “Proceed with Caution Toward
the Self-Driving Car,” by Will Knight. 2013 by Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. All rights reserved.
http://www.technologyreview.com/review/513531/proceed-with-caution-toward-the-self-driving-car/
http://www.technologyreview.com/review/513531/proceed-with-caution-toward-the-self-driving-car/
5.
FoxNews, December 16, 2011, "Google Granted Patent for
Driverless Car Technology.” 2011 by FOX News Network, LLC. All
rights reserved.
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2011/12/16/google-granted-patent-for-driverless-car-technology/
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2011/12/16/google-granted-patent-for-driverless-car-technology/
6.
New Geography, January 18, 2013, “Will Driverless Cars
Help Us Drive Less?” by Jeff Khau. © 2013 by New Geography. All
rights reserved.
http://www.newgeography.com/content/003406-will-driverless-cars-help-us-drive-less
http://www.newgeography.com/content/003406-will-driverless-cars-help-us-drive-less
7.
MIT Technology Review, November/December 2013, “Driverless Cars
Are Further Away Than You Think,” by Will Knight. © 2013 by Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520431/driverless-cars-are-further-away-than-you-think/
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/520431/driverless-cars-are-further-away-than-you-think/
8.
Forbes, July 8, 2013, “How Will Google’s Driverless Cars Change
Cities? It Will Expand Them, Massively,” by Tim Worstall. © 2013 by
Forbes.com, LLC. All rights
reserved.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/07/08/how-will-googles-driverless-cars-change-cities-it-will-expand-them-massively/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/07/08/how-will-googles-driverless-cars-change-cities-it-will-expand-them-massively/
9.
Huffington Post, September 16, 2013, “No One Understands the
Scariest, Most Dangerous Part of a Self-Driving Car: Us,” by Bianca
Bosker. © 2013 by TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc. All rights
reserved.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/16/self-driving-car_n_3909069.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/16/self-driving-car_n_3909069.html
10.
Daily Mail, November 18, 2013, “Is Autopilot Making
Flight MORE Dangerous? By Ellie Zolfagharifard.” © 2013 by Associated
Newspapers Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2509316/Is-autopilot-making-flight-travel-MORE-dangerous-FAA-claims-thirds-pilots-make-mistakes-reliance-technology.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2509316/Is-autopilot-making-flight-travel-MORE-dangerous-FAA-claims-thirds-pilots-make-mistakes-reliance-technology.html
11.
MIT Technology Review, May/June 2013, “Proceed with Caution Toward
the Self-Driving Car,” by Will Knight. 2013 by Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. All rights reserved.
http://www.technologyreview.com/review/513531/proceed-with-caution-toward-the-self-driving-car/
http://www.technologyreview.com/review/513531/proceed-with-caution-toward-the-self-driving-car/
12.
Strategy+Business, Summer 2013, “The Next Autonomous Car Is a
Truck,” by Peter Conway. © 2013 by Booz & Company, Inc. All
rights reserved.
http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00176
http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00176
No comments:
Post a Comment