FT CASE STUDY
July 15, 2013 5:04 pm
By Paolo Aversa
The story
The arrival of Derek
Gardner at the Tyrrell Formula One team in 1970 as technical director produced
a series of outstanding successes. These included Sir Jackie Stewart winning
the F1 drivers’ championships in 1971 and 1973, as well as Tyrrell’s triumph in
the constructor’s championship in 1973.
F1 regulations were
looser than today and teams continually tried radical new ideas to help catch
up with the top performers. By 1974 it was evident that Ford, which powered the
Tyrrell car, was complacent in the face of the new 12-cylinder engine of Ferrari
and Matra.
The challenge
As Gardner put it,
Tyrrell needed a big breakthrough or it would risk being “hopelessly
outclassed”. With Ford not undertaking any significant development for its
engines, Gardner decided an alternative was to design smaller front wheels,
which would reduce lift and increase speed. But this would threaten the car’s
grip during turns and its overall stability.
The strategy
Gardner returned to a
striking design he had developed before, but not applied, to solve instability
problems. The Tyrrell P34, a pioneering six-wheel car with four smaller front
wheels and two standard-size rear wheels, improved downforce and grip, and
significantly increased the car’s cornering speed.
Persuading Tyrrell’s
team and suppliers to support such a radical innovation was a struggle, but the
P34 eventually made its jaw-dropping debut in the 1976 season, as the first
six-wheel car.
The results
The Tyrrell P34
threatened to dominate F1 – but only for a short period. Four races after its
debut, Jodie Scheckter and Patrick Depailler finished first and second in the
Swedish Grand Prix. The season ended with Tyrrell coming third in the
constructors’ championship, with Scheckter and Depailler third and fourth in
the drivers’ championship.
However, Tyrrell had
not considered the critical importance of Goodyear, the official tyre supplier for all
F1 teams. The tyremaker had agreed to custom-make one “small-size” model for
Tyrrell. But it turned out that Goodyear was not prepared to continue
development of the size.
For the tyremaker,
there were not enough economies of scale because Tyrrell was the only car using
small wheels. It judged that the research and development costs were too high
to be covered by just one team.
Tyrrell failed to
persuade Goodyear that, if the six-wheeler was consistently successful, other
teams would adopt the design. The tyremaker was also unconvinced of the wider
potential of the design.
While Goodyear worked
on improving the standard tyres on all F1 cars throughout the 1976 season, it
did not work on development of the bespoke P34 front tyres. As a result, the
Tyrrell car’s rear tyres became faster and more durable, while the P34 front
tyres did not. The disparity undermined the car’s balance and made it almost
undriveable.
In addition, the
front brakes suffered overheating problems because of limited ventilation
inside the small front wheels.
Eventually, Tyrrell
abandoned the P34 project. Scheckter moved to the Wolf F1 team and Gardner –
one of the most acclaimed and inventive F1 designers – resigned from Tyrrell
and turned his back on F1 for good.
The lesson
Just because an
innovation is exciting, it is not guaranteed market success. Tyrrell’s P34
experience confirms the critical importance of strategic suppliers to executing
innovative ideas.
In highly
technological environments, the outcome of an innovation often depends on
several parties’ support and involvement. Businesses must engage with their
most important suppliers when innovating.
The six-wheel concept
was an effective idea, and although it vanished from F1 – six-wheelers were
subsequently banned when the sport introduced more design restrictions – the
idea now has several applications, such as all-terrain vehicles, vans, buses,
trucks and Covini sports cars. If
Tyrrell had persuaded Goodyear to support the P34, we might all be driving cars
with two extra wheels today.
The writer is Marie Curie Research Fellow of Strategy at Cass
Business School
No comments:
Post a Comment